ARTICLE
26 November 2024

LD Düsseldorf, November 20, 2024, Procedural Order, UPC_CFI_347/2024 And UPC_CFI_368/2024

BP
Bardehle Pagenberg

Contributor

BARDEHLE PAGENBERG combines the expertise of attorneys-at-law and patent attorneys. As one of the largest IP firms in Europe, BARDEHLE PAGENBERG advises in all fields of Intellectual Property, including all procedures before the patent and trademark offices as well as litigation before the courts through all instances.
"Obvious slips" within the meaning of R. 353 RoP, which allow the Court to rectify a decision or order, are all incorrect or incomplete statements of what the Court actually intended in the order or decision.
Germany Intellectual Property

1. Key takeaways

"Obvious slips" within the meaning of R. 353 RoP, which allow the Court to rectify a decision or order, are all incorrect or incomplete statements of what the Court actually intended in the order or decision. In other words, the declaration of the Court's intention in the decision or order must deviate from the intention that existed when the decision was made (cf. UPC_CFI_177/2023, Order dated 30 June 2023, myStromer/Revolt Zycling).

Content 1

2. Division

LD Düsseldorf

3. UPC number

UPC_CFI_347/2024 and UPC_CFI_368/2024

4. Type of proceedings

Infringement action

5. Parties

Applicant: Valeo Electrification

Defendants: 1. Magna PT B.V. & Co. KG, 2. Magna PT s.r.o., 3. Magna International France, SARL

6. Patent(s)

EP 3 320 602 and EP 3 320 604

7. Jurisdictions

Place jurisdictions

8. Body of legislation / Rules

Rule 353 RoP

1. Key takeaways

"Obvious slips" within the meaning of R. 353 RoP, which allow the Court to rectify a decision or order, are all incorrect or incomplete statements of what the Court actually intended in the order or decision. In other words, the declaration of the Court's intention in the decision or order must deviate from the intention that existed when the decision was made (cf. UPC_CFI_177/2023, Order dated 30 June 2023, myStromer/Revolt Zycling).

Content 1

2. Division

LD Düsseldorf

3. UPC number

UPC_CFI_347/2024 and UPC_CFI_368/2024

4. Type of proceedings

Infringement action

5. Parties

Applicant: Valeo Electrification

Defendants: 1. Magna PT B.V. & Co. KG, 2. Magna PT s.r.o., 3. Magna International France, SARL

6. Patent(s)

EP 3 320 602 and EP 3 320 604

7. Jurisdictions

Place jurisdictions

8. Body of legislation / Rules

Rule 353 RoP

UPC_CFI_347-2024_LD Düsseldorf_2024-11-20 Download

UPC_CFI_368-2024_LD Düsseldorf_2024-11-20 Download

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More