Germany Ratifies EU Unified Patent Court (UPC) Agreement, But Prospects For The UPC Remain Uncertain - Patent

Other Author: Charlotte Lehmann, Legal Intern

On 7 August 2021, Germany formally ratified the Agreement on a Unified EU Patent Court ("UPC Agreement"). The ratification came after battles in recent years over the constitutionality of the ratification bill.

In 2017, the German ratification was put on hold because a constitutional complaint had argued that the German law approving the UPC Agreement was passed without the required quorum of the German Parliament. After the German parliamentarians fixed their mistake and approved the draft law with a two-thirds majority on 26 November 2020, the ratification was stopped for a second time due to two applications for an interim injunction against the ratification bill. On 23 June 2021, both complaints were held inadmissible by the Federal Constitutional Court as the complainants had failed to sufficiently substantiate a possible violation of their fundamental rights.

The ratification concludes the German national ratification process, but the prospects of the Unified EU Patent Court and the EU Unitary Patent entering into force anytime soon remain uncertain, especially after the UK ceased to be a member of the EU in 2020.

The Idea of a Unitary European Patent

At present, patent protection in Europe can be obtained through either national patents, issued by the respective national offices, or European patents, granted by the European Patent Office. However, despite the name suggesting otherwise, a European patent is not a unitary property right with effect for the entire EU but only a 'bundle' of individual national patents. Judicial relief can only be obtained on a national level and only applies to the territory of each respective member state.

On 19 February 2013, Germany, together with 24 other EU member states, signed the UPC Agreement, which is part of a regulatory package on patents that ultimately aims to introduce a European patent with unitary effect at the EU level. The entering into force of the UPC Agreement will complete the reform of the European patent system, which has long been pursued. The UPC Agreement provides for the establishment of a Unified Patent Court as a court common to all participating member states for disputes concerning European patents and European patents with unitary effect. The UPC would have exclusive jurisdiction over various types of patent disputes such as nullity and infringement actions.

Requirements for Entry into Force

The UPC Agreement was conceived as an international treaty between the participating EU member states and, as such, requires ratification in each member state. According to Art. 89(1) of the UPC Agreement, it shall enter into force once 13 member states have ratified it, including the three member states in which the highest number of European patents had effect in 2012 (Germany, UK and France).

Quo Vadis, UPC?

As of today, Germany and 15 other EU member states, including France, have ratified the UPC Agreement. And although the German ratification has removed one major obstacle, others have arisen as a result of the UK ceasing to be an EU member state and withdrawing its UPC ratification in 2020. Not only was the UK required to ratify the UPC Agreement, but also one of the branches of the UPC's central division was supposed to have a seat in London. There is ongoing debate on whether the member state with the fourth highest number of European patent applications in 2012 (likely Italy) can simply replace the UK. The Preparatory Committee for the UPC is currently discussing the consequences of the UK's withdrawal and will announce the way forward on its website soon.

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe - Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.