ARTICLE
8 February 2024

Duty In Equity To Provide Shareholders With Sufficient Information - Cyprus Shareholder Disputes

Phoebus, Christos Clerides & Associates LLC (Clerides Legal)

Contributor

Phoebus, Christos Clerides & Associates LLC is a leading Cyprus-based law firm founded in 1950 by Phoebus Clerides, former Minister of Justice and Member of Parliament. His son, Dr. Christos Clerides—graduate of King’s College London and former MP, National Council member, and Cyprus Bar Association President—later led the firm. Now under the third generation—Phoebe Cleridou, Alexandros Clerides, and Constantinos Clerides—the firm upholds its legacy of excellence, specialising in litigation and dispute resolution. For over 75 years, it has represented clients in complex cases across all levels of Cypriot courts. Its practice spans civil, commercial, constitutional, administrative, criminal, and human rights law. The firm also advises on corporate, commercial, contractual, real estate, and banking matters with a focus on dispute prevention. With 16 experienced legal professionals, the firm combines tradition with a client-focused approach, earning a strong reputation for advocacy, integrity, and legal precision.
The directors owe a residual duty, said to be a duty "in equity" short of a fiduciary duty, to give to shareholders sufficient information for them to make an informed decision about proposals to be put to them at a company meeting.
Cyprus Corporate/Commercial Law

Duty in equity to provide shareholders with sufficient information

The directors owe a residual duty, said to be a duty "in equity" short of a fiduciary duty, to give to shareholders sufficient information for them to make an informed decision about proposals to be put to them at a company meeting.

In Sharp v Blank [2017] B.C.C. 187, shareholders of Lloyds Bank sued former directors of the bank for breach of their fiduciary duties in relation to the bank's takeover of another bank, HBOS. It was common ground that the directors owed a duty to provide the shareholders with sufficient information to enable them to make an informed decision about how to vote in relation to the proposed acquisition. It was also common ground that this duty entailed a duty not to mislead or conceal material information and to advise shareholders in clear and comprehensible terms.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More