ARTICLE
8 February 2024

Time Has Run Out For China's 15-Day Mailing Rule

FL
Foley & Lardner

Contributor

Foley & Lardner LLP looks beyond the law to focus on the constantly evolving demands facing our clients and their industries. With over 1,100 lawyers in 24 offices across the United States, Mexico, Europe and Asia, Foley approaches client service by first understanding our clients’ priorities, objectives and challenges. We work hard to understand our clients’ issues and forge long-term relationships with them to help achieve successful outcomes and solve their legal issues through practical business advice and cutting-edge legal insight. Our clients view us as trusted business advisors because we understand that great legal service is only valuable if it is relevant, practical and beneficial to their businesses.
As of January 20, 2024, applicants are no longer able to enjoy a 15-day grace period for most response deadlines pertaining to patent applications being pursued in the Chinese National Intellectual...
China Intellectual Property
Foley & Lardner are most popular:
  • within Coronavirus (COVID-19) and Cannabis & Hemp topic(s)

As of January 20, 2024, applicants are no longer able to enjoy a 15-day grace period for most response deadlines pertaining to patent applications being pursued in the Chinese National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA). This change was announced in Order 769 on December 21, 2023, and took effect on January 20, 2024. CNIPA's elimination of this grace period is similar to the European Patent Office's (EPO) recent elimination of its 10-day rule, which we wrote about here.

The change in China eliminates the 15-day grace period for responding to communications sent electronically, which includes most CNIPA correspondence. With the elimination of the grace period, an electronic communication is considered delivered on the date printed on the correspondence, and response deadlines are measured from the printed date.

However, in the event the CNIPA does mail correspondence requiring a response, the 15-day grace period will apply. That is because the grace period is based on the presumption that physical correspondence sent by mail will have been delivered 15 days from the date printed on the correspondence, and the response period is measured from the presumptive delivery date.

As with the elimination of the EPO's 10-day rule, elimination of this grace period may require practitioners to adjust their response practices, but will simplify the calculation of deadlines.

Other Changes

While not discussed here, Order 769 enacted additional changes warranting attention, including provisions relating to patent term adjustment, patent term extension, protection of partial designs, addition or correction of priority claims, restoration of priority rights, and incorporation by reference. Applicants pursuing patents in China may want to consult with patent counsel on how they may impact their portfolios.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More