ARTICLE
1 February 2023

以案浅析外观设计专利在申请阶段关于"新设计"的争辩策略

CP
CCPIT Patent & Trademark Law Office

Contributor

CCPIT PATENT AND TRADEMARK LAW OFFICE is the oldest and one of the largest full-service intellectual property law firms in China. Our firm has 322 patent and trademark attorneys, among whom 93 are qualified as attorneys-at-law. We provide consultation, prosecution, mediation, administrative enforcement and litigation services relating to patents, trademarks, copyrights, domain names, trade secrets, trade dress, unfair competition and other intellectual property-related matters. headquartered in Beijing, we have branch offices in New York, Silicon Valley, Tokyo, Munich, Madrid, Hongkong, Shanghai,Guangzhou and Shenzhen.
在外观设计专利的申请阶段,审查员以外观设计不符合专利法第二条第四款规定的"新设计"为由发出审查意见甚至驳回的案例虽然比较少,但一&#
China Intellectual Property
CCPIT Patent & Trademark Law Office are most popular:
  • within Compliance topic(s)
  • with readers working within the Pharmaceuticals & BioTech and Retail & Leisure industries

在外观设计专利的申请阶段,审查员以外观设计不符合专利法第二条第四款规定的"新设计"为由发出审查意见甚至驳回的案例虽然比较少,但一旦遇到这类审查意见,申请人/专利代理师对如何争辩会感到无从下手、力不从心,就如在发明专利申请阶段遇到审查员将某一特征认定为"容易想到的"或者"属于常规技术手段"那样,难以有理有据地进行争辩。本文旨在通过梳理我国法律对外观设计专利"新设计"的具体规定,并结合成功的争辩案例,浅析此类审查意见的争辩策略。

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More