ARTICLE
17 October 2011

Big Fine For Environmental Consultant

SL
Siskinds LLP

Contributor

Since 1937, Siskinds has been that firm of specialists serving individuals, families and businesses in southwestern Ontario and Canada from our offices in London, Sarnia and Quebec City. We’ve grown as the world around us has evolved. Today, we are a team of over 230 lawyers and support staff covering personal, business, personal injury and class action law and over 25 specialized practice areas.
Fines of $201,500, plus the 25% victim fine surcharge, have been imposed on an environmental consultant, his company and its client, for violations of the Ontario Water Resources Act.
Canada Environment

Fines of $201,500, plus the 25% victim fine surcharge, have been imposed on an environmental consultant, his company and its client, for violations of the Ontario Water Resources Act. The client was also sent to jail.

The convictions relate to the construction of wells by senior environmental consultant Bruce Brown (a PhD geochemist) and Bruce A. Brown Associates Limited at a Belleville property owned by Sinclair Landing Inc, of which James Sinclair is the Director. While the wells did not cause adverse impacts to the local community and environment, they were constructed by an unlicensed well technician, records related to the wells were not submitted as required, wells were not properly abandoned and false or misleading information was received.

Bruce Brown was fined $35,000 and placed on probation for a year. His company, Brown Associates, was fined $126,000. Their client, James Sinclair, was fined $8,500 and sentenced to 15 days in jail and placed on probation for a year. Sinclair Landing Inc was fined $32,000. All parties were given 24 months to pay the fines.

While the wells did not cause adverse impacts to the local community and environment, the court found that they were constructed by an unlicensed well technician, records related to the wells were not submitted as required, wells were not properly abandoned and false or misleading information was received. For a previous case involving Bruce Brown, see envirolaw.com/assets/enews/2003/junjuly03.pdf.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More