ARTICLE
30 July 2012

Fully Appreciating Ontario’s New Summary Judgment Rule

BJ
Bennett Jones LLP

Contributor

Bennett Jones is one of Canada's premier business law firms and home to 500 lawyers and business advisors. With deep experience in complex transactions and litigation matters, the firm is well equipped to advise businesses and investors with Canadian ventures, and connect Canadian businesses and investors with opportunities around the world.
In December 2011, the Court of Appeal for Ontario provided much-needed clarification on the scope and purpose of Ontario’s new summary judgment rule (Combined Air Mechanical Services Inc. v Flesch, 2011 ONCA 764).
Canada Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

An explanation of the Court of Appeal's decision and its subsequent application

In December 2011, the Court of Appeal for Ontario provided much-needed clarification on the scope and purpose of Ontario's new summary judgment rule (Combined Air Mechanical Services Inc. v Flesch, 2011 ONCA 764). The issue was important enough that the Court joined together five very different appeals from summary judgment motions, and the appeals were heard by a rare five-judge civil panel. Published in the July 2012 edition of Civil Writes- the CBA National Civil Litigation Section Newsletter.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More