Matthew Hartman

Voluminous Expert Testimony And Exhibits Insufficient On Their Own To Warrant Denial Of IPR Institution

PTAB: Merely Showing That A Reference Was Available On The Internet Does Not Establish 'Public Accessibility'

PTAB: Digital Repository's Listed Publication Date Insufficient To Show Reference's Public Availability

Defendant's Non-Party Status To IPRs Dooms Stay Request, Despite Agreement To Be Bound By IPR Estoppel

Two Product Market For Bamboo Decking Justifies Jury Award Of Lost Profits

The Claims As A Whole, Including ‘Conventional' Physical Components, Must Be Considered At Step One Of The Alice Test For Determining Patent Eligibility Under Section 101

Federal Circuit: Preliminary Means Preliminary

IPR Estoppel Does Not Prohibit ‘Cumulative Or Duplicative' System-Based Invalidity Defenses In District Court Actions

Federal Circuit: Burden Of Proof In IPR Estoppel Rests With Patentee, Not Accused Infringer

USPTO Director: Adverse Judgment Not Appropriate Where There Was No 'Unequivocal' Abandonment