In July 2025, NSW Police Sex Crimes Squad detectives, acting through Strike Force Trawler, arrested a 29-year-old man in Westmead for offences related to online child exploitation. The operation involved detectives assuming the online identity of an adult woman with a young child, engaging in conversations that led the accused to allegedly solicit sexual activity and child abuse material.
The man was charged with multiple serious offences under the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), including:
- Use of a carriage service to engage in sexual activity with a child
- Use of a carriage service to solicit child abuse material
- Use of a carriage service to make available child abuse material
He was refused bail and appeared before Parramatta Bail Court.
Legal Framework and Offence Elements
Offences of this nature are grounded in federal law, reflecting the seriousness with which the Australian legal system treats online child exploitation. Central to these charges are elements of intent, use of technology, and the identity of the victim.
- Use of a carriage service: This element requires proof that the accused intentionally utilised telecommunications (internet, phone, or similar) to facilitate or attempt prohibited sexual conduct.
- Engagement with a minor: The prosecution must establish that the accused knew, or was reckless as to whether, the target was a child.
- Solicitation versus distribution: Charges may relate not only to the act of soliciting sexual material but also to making it available, highlighting the broad reach of the law to prevent harm.
Technology as Both Instrument and Liability
The digital environment that enables solicitation also enables law enforcement to intervene early. In this case, Strike Force Trawler leveraged undercover identities to intercept attempts before real-world harm occurred. This highlights a critical tension in modern law:
- Prevention vs. entrapment - Police must respond to, not induce, criminal intent.
- Digital evidence - Metadata, timestamps, and server logs form the backbone of prosecution, yet raise evidentiary and privacy questions.
- Rapid escalation - Offenders often move between platforms and identities, challenging legal systems to keep pace.
Undercover Operations and Entrapment Considerations
Undercover operations are indispensable investigative tools in the detection and prosecution of online grooming and child exploitation offences. Their use, however, must be carefully calibrated to ensure compliance with both statutory and common law protections, particularly to avoid claims of entrapment. Entrapment arises where law enforcement conduct induces or persuades an individual to commit an offence they would not have otherwise committed, thereby undermining the voluntariness of the alleged criminal conduct. In the present case, detectives from Strike Force Trawler acted in accordance with ss 474.26 and 474.27 of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), which criminalise the use of a carriage service to solicit or procure child abuse material and provide the framework within which investigative responses must occur.
The operation was conducted such that police responded to unsolicited sexualised communications initiated by the accused, rather than initiating or escalating the interaction. This approach ensured that the accused's actions could be characterised as volitional and autonomous, mitigating the risk of successful entrapment arguments.
Need Legal Assistance?
If you or someone you know is facing a traffic offence, speak with a Parramatta Criminal lawyer.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.