Companies in Australia will soon have to abide by a set of significant climate disclosures aligned with the International Sustainability Standards Board guidelines. These disclosures, which will impose significant compliance costs on companies, focus on the typical material demanded by mandatory climate disclosures--e.g., disclosures of Scope 1, Scope 2, and Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions, and climate-related risks and opportunities.
This action by Australia demonstrates the increasing global prevalence of mandatory climate disclosure rules. The recent action by the SEC in promulgating mandatory climate disclosures--although currently stayed by litigation--should be seen in this context. Moreover, should a particular set of mandatory climate disclosure regulations become standard throughout the developed world, it is unlikely that American business would be able to fully avoid generating information to satisfy such disclosures (e.g., due to demands from foreign counterparties), even if the U.S. does not fully enact or implement such climate disclosures.
Australia's plans to introduce stringent rules on climate
disclosures are driving up concerns among businesses about
compliance in one of the world's biggest per-capita
emitters.
More than 6,000 companies including listed and unlisted firms,
financial institutions and asset owners will eventually fall under
the auspices of mandatory rules being rolled out from
January.
Because Australia is a larger market, that will impact more
companies than in New Zealand, Hong Kong and Singapore, all of
which have been seen as standard-setters so far in Asia, according
to datafrom Bloomberg Intelligence.
Fresh rules promise to move Australia from a laggard on climate
policies to among the first jurisdictions globally to implement
reporting in line with new International Sustainability Standards
Board guidelines.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
