Comparative Guides

Welcome to Mondaq Comparative Guides - your comparative global Q&A guide.

Our Comparative Guides provide an overview of some of the key points of law and practice and allow you to compare regulatory environments and laws across multiple jurisdictions.

Start by selecting your Topic of interest below. Then choose your Regions and finally refine the exact Subjects you are seeking clarity on to view detailed analysis provided by our carefully selected internationally recognised experts.

4. Results: Answers
Merger Control
Trends and predictions
How would you describe the current merger control landscape and prevailing trends in your jurisdiction? Are any new developments anticipated in the next 12 months, including any proposed legislative reforms?

Answer ... Several major merger control decisions concerning high-value transactions were issued in 2018.

Most significantly, the Competition Board issued its final decision in the Phase II review on the merger of Luxottica Group SpA and Essilor International SA (18-36/585-286, 1 October 2018). The board found that as the notified transaction would result in the creation or strengthening of a dominant position within the meaning of Article 7 of Law 4054, and would significantly impede competition in the market, it could not approve the transaction unconditionally. However, the transaction was conditionally approved based on the remedies submitted, which included structural commitments concerning the divestiture of Merve Optik Sanayi ve Ticaret Aª (under which the merged entity also undertook not to acquire the distribution rights of the brands subject to the licence agreement between Merve Optik Sanayi ve Ticaret Aª and Marcolin SpA) and behavioural commitments. The behavioural commitments will be re-evaluated by the Competition Board at the end of a three-year period.

A second key decision concerned Bayer Aktiengesellschaft’s acquisition of sole control over Monsanto Company (18-14/261-126, 8 May 2018). The Competition Board considered that the transaction could create or strengthen Bayer’s dominant position and could thus significantly impede effective competition in the relevant market, and thus decided to initiate a Phase II review in a decision of 15 May 2017. After Bayer committed to the European Commission to divest its global cotton seeds business and vegetable seeds business during the Phase II period, the Competition Board conditionally approved the transaction. It found that the transaction would no longer create or strengthen a dominant position and significantly impede competition, since the commitments submitted to the European Commission with regard to vegetable seeds, cotton seeds, corn seeds and insecticide seed dressings for corn would eliminate horizontal and vertical overlaps occurring in the relevant markets in Turkey.

For more information about this answer please contact: Gönenç Gürkaynak from ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law