ARTICLE
10 February 2020

Court Rules For Insured In A Ransomware Insurance Claim!

FL
Foley & Lardner

Contributor

Foley & Lardner LLP looks beyond the law to focus on the constantly evolving demands facing our clients and their industries. With over 1,100 lawyers in 24 offices across the United States, Mexico, Europe and Asia, Foley approaches client service by first understanding our clients’ priorities, objectives and challenges. We work hard to understand our clients’ issues and forge long-term relationships with them to help achieve successful outcomes and solve their legal issues through practical business advice and cutting-edge legal insight. Our clients view us as trusted business advisors because we understand that great legal service is only valuable if it is relevant, practical and beneficial to their businesses.
My friend Judy Greenwald reported on BusinessInsurance.com that "A U.S. District Court ruling in Maryland that an insurer must indemnify a screen-printing business under its business owner's policy
United States Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

My friend Judy Greenwald reported on BusinessInsurance.com that "A U.S. District Court ruling in Maryland that an insurer must indemnify a screen-printing business under its business owner's policy for costs incurred in a ransomware attack may be the first of its kind concerning ransomware, and is likely to be cited frequently by other courts, some experts say."  The February 4, 2020 article entitled "Ransomware case's impact could be far-reaching" regarding case of National Ink & Stitch LLC v. State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Co. (Baltimore) included these comments from the Court's Order granting summary judgment:

The plain language of the Policy contemplates that data and software are covered and can experience 'direct physical loss or damage.'

In addition to Plaintiff's data and software constituting covered property under the Policy's terms, Plaintiff has also demonstrated damage to the computer system itself, despite its residual ability to function,...

State Auto seems to equate 'physical loss or damage' to Plaintiff's computer system to require an utter inability to function. 

The Policy language, and the relevant case law, impose no such prerequisite,...

Judy quote me about the probability of winning a motion for summary judge:

...is very low, and so the fact that this judge ruled this way tells me the evidence in front of her was absolutely persuasive.

My expectation is that insurance for ransomware may be written differently following this ruling!

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More