ARTICLE
9 January 2018

Trump Administration Rumored To Be Looking At H-1B Extensions Under AC21

OD
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart

Contributor

Ogletree Deakins is a labor and employment law firm representing management in all types of employment-related legal matters. Ogletree Deakins has more than 850 attorneys located in 53 offices across the United States and in Europe, Canada, and Mexico. The firm represents a range of clients, from small businesses to Fortune 50 companies.
The proposal has been reported by the press, often with attention-grabbing headlines.
United States Immigration

Recently, we have seen several news stories discussing a rumored government proposal to eliminate H-1B extensions beyond the standard six-year limit. No such action has yet been taken, and to date H-1B visa holders may continue to request extensions based on the provisions of the American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act (AC21). Under current law, extensions beyond the initial H-1B period of six years are available to foreign nationals with pending green card petitions. The law that enables beyond-limit extensions, commonly known as AC21, mainly benefits persons born in India and China, who are subject to lengthy green card backlogs.

The proposal has been reported by the press, often with attention-grabbing headlines. The articles report that the Trump administration and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) are evaluating whether language used in sections of AC21 allows the government to stop granting H-1B extensions beyond the six-year limit.

We anticipate that the Trump administration and DHS will ultimately conclude that they do not have the authority to halt H-1B extensions under the parameters of AC21. While the immigration authorities have broad discretion to grant immigration benefits, they cannot act in contradiction to the intent of the law.

According to press reports, the rumored proposal would contradict the clear language of AC21. If the administration does move forward with the proposal—which, again, is only a rumor at present—we anticipate significant litigation in defense of AC21.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More