ARTICLE
15 March 2022

TTABlog Test: How Did These Four Section 2(d) Appeals Turn Out?

WG
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.

Contributor

For nearly a century, Wolf Greenfield has helped clients protect their most valuable intellectual property. The firm offers a full range of IP services, including patent prosecution and litigation; post-grant proceedings, including IPRs; opinions and strategic counseling; licensing; intellectual property audits and due diligence; trademark and copyright prosecution and litigation; and other issues related to the commercialization of intellectual property.
Well, we finally had a reversal, or at least a partial reversal, in a Section 2(d) appeal: see the TRITAN decision (here).
United States Intellectual Property

Well, we finally had a reversal, or at least a partial reversal, in a Section 2(d) appeal: see the TRITAN decision (here). But the other 40 Section 2(d) appeals decided this year resulted in affirmances. Here are four more appeals decided this week. How do you think they turned out? Answer in first comment.

1171916.jpg

In re JSS Concepts Holding Co., LLC, Serial No. 88362890 (March 3, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas Shaw) [Section 2(d) refusal of HEIRLOOM HOSPITALITY for "Offering business management assistance in the establishment and operation of restaurants and bars; Outsource service provider in the field of business management of restaurants and bars" [HOSPITALITY disclaimed], in view of the registered mark HEIRLOOM for "Branding services, namely, consulting, development, management and marketing of brands for businesses and/or individuals."]

1171916a.jpg

In re Shell Case Limited , Serial No. 79273053 (March 8, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas Shaw). [Section 2(d) refusal of SHELL-CASE in stylized form, for "Bags, namely, all-purpose carrying bags, leather bags for packaging, leather bags for component packaging, leather bags for shipment of merchandise and components, all-purpose carrying bags for salespeople, bags for climbers in the nature of all-purpose carrying bags, all purpose carrying bags for use by campers, bag for sports, backpacks, suitcases," in view of the registered mark SHELLVCASE, for, inter alia, "Bags adapted for laptops."]

1171916b.jpg


In re Billy Jack Carter, Serial No. 88464536 (March 8, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Karen Kuhlke). [Section 2(d) refusal of CHAPTRE in view of the registered mark CHAPTER for  overlapping real estate services.] 

1171916c.jpg

In re Moonlite Bar-B-Q Inn, Inc., Serial No. 86636794 (March 9, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Albert Zervas. [Section 2(d) refusal of MOONLITE for "wines" in view of the registered mark MOONLIGHT MEADERY for "honey wine, wine" [MEADERY disclaimed]].

1171916d.jpg

Read comments and post your comment here.

The TTABlog

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More