ARTICLE
31 March 2025

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update: February 2025

FH
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP

Contributor

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP is a law firm dedicated to advancing ideas, discoveries, and innovations that drive businesses around the world. From offices in the United States, Europe, and Asia, Finnegan works with leading innovators to protect, advocate, and leverage their most important intellectual property (IP) assets.
This is part of a series of articles discussing recent orders of interest issued in patent cases by the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts.
United States Intellectual Property

This is part of a series of articles discussing recent orders of interest issued in patent cases by the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts.

In Insulet Corporation v. EOFlow, Co. Ltd. et al No. 1.23-cv-11780, Chief Judge Saylor entered a stipulated Consent Permanent Injunction as to Plaintiff and certain individual Defendants.

This injunction permanently prohibits those Defendants from using or assisting others in using Plaintiff's trade secrets, mandates the return or destruction of related documents, and requires those Defendants to demand the return and destruction of such trade secrets by third parties to whom they may have been disclosed. It also grants Plaintiff audit rights to verify compliance. The Court retained jurisdiction.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More