ARTICLE
10 June 2024

A Question Of Use: Recent US Trade Secret Case May Flip The Script

M
Mintz

Contributor

Mintz is a litigation powerhouse and business accelerator serving leaders in life sciences, private equity, sustainable energy, and technology. The world’s most innovative companies trust Mintz to provide expert advice, protect and monetize their IP, negotiate deals, source financing, and solve complex legal challenges. The firm has over 600 attorneys across offices in Boston, Los Angeles, Miami, New York, Washington, DC, San Francisco, San Diego, and Toronto.
Member Brad Scheller spoke with IAM discussing how a recent trade secret dispute has led to a Texas judge's decision that, under the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA),
United States Intellectual Property

Member Brad Scheller spoke with IAM discussing how a recent trade secret dispute has led to a Texas judge's decision that, under the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA), there is no cause for action where there has been no "use" of allegedly stolen information, sparking debate in the IP industry.

Brad said, "Judge Jordan's recent opinion in the Providence case strictly requiring a showing of "use" would certainly seem inconsistent with the broader definition of "misappropriation" in the DTSA and would seem to ignore that all the DTSA requires is a showing of improper acquisition or disclosure."

SOURCE

IAM

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More