ARTICLE
16 July 2025

DFPI Finalizes $300,000 Settlement With Crypto Kiosk Operator For Alleged Digital Asset Law Violations

SM
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

Contributor

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more than 1,200 lawyers located in 16 offices worldwide, our client-centered approach is grounded in nearly a century of building enduring relationships on trust and collaboration. Our broad and diversified practices serve global clients—from startups to Fortune 500 companies—at every stage of the business cycle, including high-stakes litigation, complex transactions, sophisticated financings and regulatory issues. With leading edge technologies and innovation behind our team, we pride ourselves on being a strategic partner to our clients.
On June 25, the California DFPI announced that it had finalized a consent order with a cryptocurrency kiosk operator, alleging violations of the Digital Financial Assets Law (DFAL) and the California...
United States California Technology
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP are most popular:
  • within Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring and Cannabis & Hemp topic(s)

On June 25, the California DFPI announced that it had finalized a consent order with a cryptocurrency kiosk operator, alleging violations of the Digital Financial Assets Law (DFAL) and the California Consumer Financial Protection Law (CCFPL). The action marks the DFPI's first enforcement under the DFAL, which took effect on January 1, 2024.

The DFPI found that the operator repeatedly processed transactions exceeding the DFAL's $1,000 per-day limit for individual customers and failed to print the required exchange-pricing information on customer receipts. The agency further alleged that these practices amounted to unlawful, unfair, or deceptive conduct under the CCFPL.

Specifically, the consent order imposes the following obligations:

  • Monetary penalties and consumer restitution. The company must pay $300,000 in total relief, including $51,700 directed toward restitution for affected California consumers.
  • Cease and desist order. The operator must immediately stop processing over-limit transactions and issuing noncompliant receipts.
  • Compliance program reforms. The company is required to implement internal controls to prevent future violations of the DFAL and CCFPL.
  • Ongoing reporting obligations. For one year, the operator must submit written compliance updates to the DFPI every 60 days.

Putting It Into Practice: This DFAL enforcement action illustrates the layered framework California will use to govern consumer-facing crypto activity. Kiosk operators should expect heightened scrutiny and should update compliance programs to align with both DFAL disclosure mandates and broader CCFPL requirements.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More