ARTICLE
27 September 2016

SEC Enforcement Director Describes Auditor Responsibilities In The Current Regulatory Landscape

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
SEC Enforcement Director Andrew J. Ceresney outlined the legal and regulatory framework governing SEC enforcement actions against auditors.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

SEC Enforcement Director Andrew J. Ceresney outlined the legal and regulatory framework governing SEC enforcement actions against auditors. In an address on accounting liability before the American Law Institute Conference, Mr. Ceresney examined the history and context of Rule 102(e) of the SEC Rules of Practice, under which "a significant number of . . . accounting-related enforcement proceedings are instituted." The Director described "the current landscape" of audit enforcement actions and highlighted several systemic issues. He offered the following observations:

  • "before engaging with an audit client, auditors should ensure that the firm and its assigned personnel have sufficient capacity and competence to audit the client according to professional standards";
  • "audits need to be properly planned and executed, with significant risks identified and addressed through adequate audit procedures";
  • "auditors need to exercise appropriate professional skepticism, gather sufficient appropriate audit evidence, adequately document work, and, particularly when there are red flags, require more sufficient evidential matter than representations from management";
  • "auditors should consult internally when particularly troublesome issues arise"; and
  • "firms must have robust monitoring processes and training on independence issues."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More