ARTICLE
24 October 2015

Judge Robinson Issues Markman Opinion In Infringement Action Construing Six Disputed Terms In Patents-in-Suit

FR
Fox Rothschild LLP

Contributor

Who We Are

With bold growth, Fox Rothschild brings together 1,000 attorneys coast to coast. We offer the reach and resources of a national law firm combined with the personal touch and connections of a boutique firm.

Our Mission

Solving problems is our top priority. We invest the time to get to know you and understand your needs. We work hard to win every client’s loyalty. We do that by providing creative solutions and excellent client service.

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Sue L. Robinson in Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi, et al., Civil Action No. 14-317-SLR (D.Del., October 20, 2015), the Court rendered its Markman Opinion construing six (6) disputed terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 8,829,165("the '165 patent"), 8,859,741 ("the '741 patent"), and 8,871,914 ("the '914 patent").
United States Intellectual Property
Fox Rothschild LLP are most popular:
  • within Immigration and Corporate/Commercial Law topic(s)
  • with Finance and Tax Executives
  • with readers working within the Automotive, Basic Industries and Healthcare industries

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Sue L. Robinson in Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi, et al., Civil Action No. 14-317-SLR (D.Del., October 20, 2015), the Court rendered its Markman Opinion construing six (6) disputed terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 8,829,165("the '165 patent"), 8,859,741 ("the '741 patent"), and 8,871,914 ("the '914 patent").

A copy of the Memorandum Opinion is attached.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More