ARTICLE
21 January 2026

Critical IP Litigation Lessons For In-House Legal And Innovation Leaders 2025 Webinar (Video)

BK
Brooks Kushman

Contributor

Since the firms founding in 1983, Brooks Kushman has built a national reputation as a premier intellectual property law firm. We have accomplished this by attracting the best talent, and by working closely with clients to understand how your business really operates and what really drives your company or brand.
2025 brought meaningful shifts in IP litigation that influenced how companies assessed risk, built cases, and allocated litigation resources.
United States Intellectual Property
John Rondini’s articles from Brooks Kushman are most popular:
  • within Intellectual Property topic(s)
  • with readers working within the Media & Information and Construction & Engineering industries
Brooks Kushman are most popular:
  • within Privacy topic(s)
  • with Inhouse Counsel

2025 brought meaningful shifts in IP litigation that influenced how companies assessed risk, built cases, and allocated litigation resources. Courts tightened expectations around expert reliability and damages analysis, while evolving PTAB and post-grant dynamics continued to reshape parallel litigation strategy. For in-house legal and innovation teams, understanding these developments was critical to planning for 2026.

In this program, members of our litigation team broke down the most consequential rulings and trends from 2025 and translated them into practical guidance for in-house teams. The discussion examined how courts evaluated damages models and comparable licensing evidence, where expert testimony faced increased scrutiny, and how recent decisions affected post-IPR flexibility and estoppel considerations. Presenters also addressed how these shifts impacted early case assessment, budgeting, settlement positioning, and long-term enforcement strategy.

Attendees left with a clearer view of the litigation signals coming from the courts and actionable insights for managing exposure, strengthening case strategy, and aligning legal decision making with business objectives in the year ahead.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More