ARTICLE
28 August 2025

Bill Seeks To Restrict 30-Month Stay In Hatch-Waxman Litigation To One Patent

JD
Jones Day

Contributor

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,500 lawyers across five continents. The Firm is distinguished by a singular tradition of client service; the mutual commitment to, and the seamless collaboration of, a true partnership; formidable legal talent across multiple disciplines and jurisdictions; and shared professional values that focus on client needs.
A central feature of the Hatch Waxman Act is the "30-month stay," a carefully crafted compromise between the interests of innovator pharmaceutical companies and generics.
United States Intellectual Property
Jennifer J. Chheda’s articles from Jones Day are most popular:
  • with readers working within the Pharmaceuticals & BioTech industries

A central feature of the Hatch Waxman Act is the "30-month stay," a carefully crafted compromise between the interests of innovator pharmaceutical companies and generics. The innovator is required to list in the FDA's "Orange Book" all patents covering its drug product or an approved method of use. Then, if a generic applicant challenges any of those listed patents as invalid or not infringed, the innovator has 45 days to sue for patent infringement. If it does so, a 30-month stay on FDA approval of the generic is triggered, allowing for the resolution of patent issues before a generic launches. The stay helps innovators by preventing infringing competition, and helps generics avoid the specter of money damages. The 30-month stay attaches to any Orange Book patent challenged by a generic in its application to FDA.

On July 31, 2025, U.S. Senators Durbin and Cassidy introduced bill S. 4878, the "Reforming Evergreening and Manipulation that Extends Drug Years (REMEDY) Act," which would amend the Hatch Waxman Act to limit the innovator to only one Orange-Book listed patent that can be eligible for the 30-month stay, which patent the innovator must designate in advance. If a generic applicant decided not to challenge the elected patent, or if an infringement claim based on that patent were summarily adjudicated by a court, then the 30-month stay would be lost. Notably, S. 4878 does not purport to limit the number or types of patents that an innovator can obtain or list in the Orange Book.

If enacted, S. 4878 would present significant challenges for innovators in their patent prosecution and "selection" strategies. Also, S. 4878 would likely change Hatch-Waxman Act litigation, increasing injunction practice and influencing decision making on certification strategy by generics and enforcement by innovators.

We will continue to monitor the status of S. 4878

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More