ARTICLE
12 February 2025

HyClone Seeks To Quash Amgen's Subpoena Issued In Denosumab BPCIA Litigation Against Fresenius

GP
Goodwin Procter LLP

Contributor

At Goodwin, we partner with our clients to practice law with integrity, ingenuity, agility, and ambition. Our 1,600 lawyers across the United States, Europe, and Asia excel at complex transactions, high-stakes litigation and world-class advisory services in the technology, life sciences, real estate, private equity, and financial industries. Our unique combination of deep experience serving both the innovators and investors in a rapidly changing, technology-driven economy sets us apart.
On February 4, 2025, HyClone Laboratories, LLC ("HyClone"), a cell culture media supplier, filed a Motion to Quash a subpoena issued by Amgen, Inc. ("Amgen").
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences

On February 4, 2025, HyClone Laboratories, LLC ("HyClone"), a cell culture media supplier, filed a Motion to Quash a subpoena issued by Amgen, Inc. ("Amgen"). The underlying subpoena was issued in Amgen's ongoing denosumab BPCIA litigation against Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC and its affiliates ("Fresenius") in the District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, to which HyClone is a nonparty. Amgen's subpoena seeks information surrounding the formulation of HyClone's cell culture media product, the HyClone" Cell Boost" 7a Supplement ("CB7A").

In its Motion to Quash, HyClone argues that Amgen has not shown the relevance of the full CB7A formulation, and that Amgen's requests are overbroad and vague. Further, HyClone argues that Amgen's requests are unduly burdensome because they seek HyClone's trade secret information. HyClone argues that, if the Court were to order disclosure of the full CB7A formulation, the Court should require an initial "source code"-type inspection, and that any paper production(s) relating to any specific components be subject to a supplemental protective order that would impose additional restrictions, including (1) that the information be produced only on three copies of copy-proof paper per side; and (2) the information is restricted to outside counsel's eyes only and three experts per side.

Stay tuned to Big Molecule Watch as we continue to monitor key developments in ongoing denosumab litigations and the biosimilars market.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More