ARTICLE
18 October 2017

"The Cold Never Bothered Me Anyway!" SEC Again Uses Its Power To Freeze An Alleged EB-5 Scam

M
Mintz

Contributor

Mintz is a litigation powerhouse and business accelerator serving leaders in life sciences, private equity, sustainable energy, and technology. The world’s most innovative companies trust Mintz to provide expert advice, protect and monetize their IP, negotiate deals, source financing, and solve complex legal challenges. The firm has over 600 attorneys across offices in Boston, Los Angeles, Miami, New York, Washington, DC, San Francisco, San Diego, and Toronto.
Like Elsa, the Princess in Disney's classic Frozen, once again the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has utilized its power to freeze.
United States Immigration

Like Elsa, the Princess in Disney's classic Frozen, once again the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has utilized its power to freeze. In this case, the freezing of assets. In what has become an increasingly common tactic, the SEC successfully sought to freeze assets of several individuals and corporate entities in a complaint it recently brought alleging fraud in connection with securities offerings for projects under the EB-5 immigration program. As we have reported previously, particularly in the EB-5 space, the SEC has in recent years utilized the asset freeze as an enforcement tool. The EB-5 program allows foreign investors to apply for green cards in exchange for a minimum $500,000 investment in a job-creating enterprise.

In its case against Edward and Jean Chen, both residents of Arcadia, California, the SEC alleged that the Chens engaged in a "staggering" misappropriation of investor funds – diverting to themselves at least $8.6 million of the $9.5 million they raised from investors in one project, and another $3.5 million of investor funds from a second project. Rather than use the investors' money for the EB-5 approved projects, the SEC claimed that the Chens took it for their own use, purchasing numerous foreclosed residential real estate properties.

Last week, Judge Anderson in the US District Court for the Central District of California agreed with the SEC, "that good cause exists to believe that, unless restrained and enjoined by order of this Court, Defendants will dissipate, conceal, or transfer assets which could be the subject to an order directing disgorgement or the payment of civil money penalties in this action" and froze 16 separate bank accounts controlled by the Chens. In addition, Judge Anderson appointed a receiver to take control of the several related corporate entity defendants the Chens controlled and also ordered the Chens and the corporate defendants to submit an accounting of all property valued at $5,000.00 or more.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More