ARTICLE
22 December 2022

Fourth Circuit Says: Statute Of Limitations Runs From Inception Of Fire Loss In North Carolina

PD
Phelps Dunbar LLP

Contributor

Phelps is a full-service Am Law 200 law firm, blending valuable traditions and progressive ideas to foster a culture of collaboration among our lawyers in Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and London. The firm’s lawyers handle a broad range of sophisticated business needs regionally, nationally, and internationally.
With a second decision on the issue in as many years, the Fourth Circuit has confirmed that, in North Carolina, policyholders must file lawsuits to recover policy benefits for fire losses...
United States North Carolina Insurance

With a second decision on the issue in as many years, the Fourth Circuit has confirmed that, in North Carolina, policyholders must file lawsuits to recover policy benefits for fire losses within three years of the inception of the loss, rather than within three years of the alleged breach of the policy.

The insured suffered a covered fire loss at an apartment complex in April 2015. The carrier paid the ACV of the loss, with the policy providing for RCV coverage upon repair or replacement. The parties then entered appraisal in early 2017, resulting in a supplemental ACV payment by the carrier in October 2019.

In March 2020, the insured sought recoverable depreciation to purchase a replacement property, but the carrier denied the claim in April 2020 on grounds that replacement was not made "as soon as reasonably possible." The insured filed suit within months of the denial, alleging that the carrier breached the policy.

On appeal from the dismissal of the insured's lawsuit as untimely, the appellate court sided with the carrier that the lawsuit was not subject to the statute of limitations for general breach of contract, but to the limitations period in the standard fire insurance provision incorporated into the policy by North Carolina statute. Thus, rather than running from the alleged breach of the policy (i.e., the denial), the three-year filing period ran from the "inception of the loss." As the court also held that appraisals do not toll the statute of limitations in North Carolina, the lawsuit would have been untimely even before the appraisal award and supplemental payment.

Given the clear message here, carriers may see policyholders, in an effort to avoid the running of the limitations period, file protective lawsuits over disputed fire claims before the parties have determined their positions or have even satisfied loss payment conditions.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More