ARTICLE
22 December 2015

Capsule International Holdings LLC Preference Actions Filed

PF
Pierson Ferdinand LLP

Contributor

Pierson Ferdinand strives to provide excellent legal counsel and representation to clients worldwide from 20+ key markets in the US and UK. We specialize in handling complex legal matters and providing solutions to our clients' most pressing needs. Our lawyers come from top global law firms, including Am Law-ranked, regional and boutique law firms, federal and state government careers, and senior in-house counsel roles.
On December 17th and 18th, 2015, the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Capsule International Holdings, LLC, and its affiliated debtors and debtors in possession, filed approximately 80 complaints seeking the avoidance and recovery of allegedly preferential and fraudulent transfers under Sections 547, 548 and 550 of the Bankruptcy Code.
United States Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

On December 17th and 18th, 2015, the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the "Committee") of Capsule International Holdings, LLC, and its affiliated debtors and debtors in possession (the "Debtors"), filed approximately 80 complaints seeking the avoidance and recovery of allegedly preferential and fraudulent transfers under Sections 547, 548 and 550 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Committee also seeks to disallow claims of such preference defendants under Sections 502(d) and (j) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The Debtors filed voluntary petitions for bankruptcy in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware on December 19, 2013 under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. On January 6, 2014, the Office of the United States Trustee for the District of Delaware appointed the Committee.

The law firms of ASK LLP and Gellert Scali Busenkell & Brown, LLC represent the Committee in these various preference cases. The pretrial conference has not yet been scheduled. For a sample complaint filed by the Committee, click here.

For preference defendants looking for an analysis of defenses that can be asserted in response to a preference complaint, below are several articles on this topic:

Preference Payments: Brief Analysis of Preference Actions and Common Defenses

Minimizing Preference Exposure: Require Prepayment for Goods or Services

Minimizing Preference Exposure (Part II) – Contemporaneous Exchanges

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More