ARTICLE
7 October 2024

Virginia Federal Court Rules It Has Subject Matter Jurisdiction Over DTSA Claim Because Foreign Bankruptcy Proceeding Only Stayed Claims Against Debtor, Not Claims Brought By Debtor

LG
Lathrop GPM

Contributor

Successful businesses think ahead. At Lathrop GPM, we make it our business to help you anticipate trends and plan for challenges. Working together, we build exciting futures.

Lathrop GPM serves a client base whose businesses form the backbone of our economy. Our clients run factories, build skylines, cure diseases, create jobs and power our world. And we work alongside them the entire way – immersing ourselves in our clients’ organizations and partnering with them to understand the big picture, so we can think past the day-to-day and help our clients anticipate future challenges. From the research lab to the factory floor, from oil fields to skyscrapers – we work as one integrated team to help our clients achieve their most important objectives.

A federal court in Virginia recently ruled that it had federal question subject matter jurisdiction over a Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) claim, rejecting Defendants' argument that a foreign bankruptcy proceeding...
United States Virginia Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

A federal court in Virginia recently ruled that it had federal question subject matter jurisdiction over a Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) claim, rejecting Defendants' argument that a foreign bankruptcy proceeding stayed the DTSA claim and deprived the court of jurisdiction. JTH Tax LLC, d/b/a Liberty Tax Service v. Lowensky Cortorreal, 2024 WL 3928884 (E.D. Va. Aug. 23, 2024). JTH Tax LLC, a franchisor of tax preparation service franchises, filed a complaint against multiple former franchisee defendants alleging unlawful competition, including under the DTSA, and claims for breach of franchise agreements, unjust enrichment, conversion, and tortious interference. Defendants moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim and for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under the DTSA on the grounds that actions against JTH Tax were stayed by a Canadian court order in a bankruptcy proceeding involving JTH Tax.

The court applied U.S. federal bankruptcy statutes regarding foreign proceedings and concluded that the stay in the Canadian bankruptcy proceeding unambiguously applied only to actions against JTH Tax as debtor and did not prevent it from asserting claims against other parties, including the defendants. The court added that the stay did prevent any counterclaims by the defendants against JTH Tax. The court dismissed a claim for unjust enrichment against two defendants and otherwise denied the defendants' motion to dismiss as to all other claims on the grounds that JTH Tax had sufficiently and plausibly stated claims. The court also denied a motion for preliminary injunction on the grounds that JTH Tax failed to provide proper notice of the motion to the defendants.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More