ARTICLE
15 December 2017

Mintz's Health Care Enforcement Defense Group Publishes New Qui Tam Update

M
Mintz

Contributor

Mintz is a general practice, full-service Am Law 100 law firm with more than 600 attorneys. We are headquartered in Boston and have additional US offices in Los Angeles, Miami, New York City, San Diego, San Francisco, and Washington, DC, as well as an office in Toronto, Canada.
Earlier this week, Mintz Levin's Health Care Enforcement Defense Group published its most recent Health Care Qui Tam Update.
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences

Earlier this week, Mintz Levin's Health Care Enforcement Defense Group published its most recent Health Care Qui Tam Update. This Update covers 34 health care-related qui tam cases that were unsealed in July 2017.

Here are some of the highlights:

  • Of the 34 cases unsealed in July 2017, the government intervened (in whole or in part) in six cases and declined to intervene in 28.

  • These 34 unsealed cases were filed in 21 different courts, including:

    • Five in the Southern District of Ohio;
    • Three in the District of Arizona; and
    • Three in the Western District of Virginia.
  • The targeted entities included:

    • Four cases against laboratory testing companies;
    • Four cases involving pharmacy-related businesses; and
    • Five cases filed against companies operating hospices (this appears to be a growing trend).
  • As usual, relators were overwhelmingly current and former employees:

    • 21 cases were brought by former employees;
    • Four cases were brought by current employees; and
    • One case was brought by a consultant to a defendant.
  • Long delays in unsealing remained the norm. The cases were under seal for an average of two years, and one case remained under seal for nearly seven years. Nevertheless:

    • One case was unsealed just 64 days after filing; and
    • Seven cases were under seal for less than six months.

This Update also analyzes health care qui tam litigation trends based on filings against health care-related entities in the 12-month period that ended on September 30, 2017. Trends analyzed include where cases were filed, the kinds of businesses targeted, the types of relators that filed cases, and how frequently the government intervened.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More