ARTICLE
26 June 2025

Time To Revisit Your HIPAA Documents After Reproductive Health Privacy Rule Vacated

SS
Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Contributor

With more than 900 lawyers across 18 offices, Seyfarth Shaw LLP provides advisory, litigation, and transactional legal services to clients worldwide. Our high-caliber legal representation and advanced delivery capabilities allow us to take on our clients’ unique challenges and opportunities-no matter the scale or complexity. Whether navigating complex litigation, negotiating transformational deals, or advising on cross-border projects, our attorneys achieve exceptional legal outcomes. Our drive for excellence leads us to seek out better ways to work with our clients and each other. We have been first-to-market on many legal service delivery innovations-and we continue to break new ground with our clients every day. This long history of excellence and innovation has created a culture with a sense of purpose and belonging for all. In turn, our culture drives our commitment to the growth of our clients, the diversity of our people, and the resilience of our workforce.
In a somewhat unsurprising turn of events, a Texas District Court vacated the HIPAA Privacy Rule to Support Reproductive Health Care Privacy (Final Rule)...
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences

Seyfarth Synopsis: In the wake of a recent federal District Court decision, the reproductive health care HIPAA Privacy rules finalized during the Biden Administration have been vacated and plan sponsors should re-evaluate the language included in their HIPAA compliance documents.

In a somewhat unsurprising turn of events, a Texas District Court vacated the HIPAA Privacy Rule to Support Reproductive Health Care Privacy (Final Rule) that added specific protections and obligations relating to reproductive health data under the HIPAA Privacy rules. In Purl v. United States Department of Health and Human Services, the U.S. District Court for the North District of Texas held that the Final Rule exceeded the Department of Health and Human Services' statutory authority, specifically noting the Department unlawfully tried to restrict and preempt state laws relating to public health, reporting obligations, and more. Although Covered Entities must continue to protect reproductive health information under the standard federal protections HIPAA affords to protected health information, the heightened restrictions and obligations imposed by the Final Rule on reproductive health care data will no longer be enforced nationwide. However, although the reproductive health care data requirements were vacated, the District Court left in place specific requirements relating to substance use disorder records under Part 2.

Plan Sponsor and Covered Entity Considerations

Given that the ruling is unlikely to be challenged by the Department under the current administration, Plan Sponsors and Covered Entities should review their HIPAA Privacy Policy, HIPAA Notice of Privacy Practices, business associate agreements, and any other related HIPAA Privacy documentation to determine whether any updates are needed. Plan sponsors that added language to their documentation relating to reproductive health care protections to comply with the Final Rule should evaluate whether this language should now be removed. Reach out to your trusted Seyfarth employee benefits attorney if you have compliance questions.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More