ARTICLE
16 January 2025

Navigating FDA's Guidance On Validation And Verification Of Analytical Testing Methods For Tobacco Products

B
BakerHostetler

Contributor

Recognized as one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler is a leading national law firm that helps clients around the world address their most complex and critical business and regulatory issues. With five core national practice groups — Business, Labor and Employment, Intellectual Property, Litigation, and Tax — the firm has more than 970 lawyers located in 14 offices coast to coast. BakerHostetler is widely regarded as having one of the country’s top 10 tax practices, a nationally recognized litigation practice, an award-winning data privacy practice and an industry-leading business practice. The firm is also recognized internationally for its groundbreaking work recovering more than $13 billion in the Madoff Recovery Initiative, representing the SIPA Trustee for the liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC. Visit bakerlaw.com
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently issued a final guidance document, Validation and Verification of Analytical Testing Methods Used for Tobacco Products. This nonbinding guidance provides tobacco.
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently issued a final guidance document, Validation and Verification of Analytical Testing Methods Used for Tobacco Products. This nonbinding guidance provides tobacco product manufacturers with recommendations on how to validate and verify analytical methods used in regulatory submissions. The document addresses critical requirements for ensuring reliable data to support applications such as Substantial Equivalence (SE) Reports, Premarket Tobacco Product Applications (PMTAs), and Modified Risk Tobacco Product Applications (MRTPAs).

The guidance emphasizes the need for robust validation of analytical methods to ensure their accuracy, precision, sensitivity, and reliability. Validation involves a systematic evaluation of methods to confirm that they are suitable for their intended purpose, and the FDA recommends using total error probability to assess the reliability of test results. In addition to validation, the document outlines the importance of verification to demonstrate that previously validated methods remain applicable when applied to new products, formulations, or conditions. Verification typically involves ensuring accuracy and selectivity, often through techniques such as spike-and-recovery assessments.

To support method validation and verification, the FDA recommends the use of certified reference standards, such as those for nicotine or other harmful and potentially harmful constituents (HPHCs). These standards are essential for ensuring consistency, reliability, and traceability in analytical testing. The guidance also highlights the critical role of analytical sampling and measurement procedures, which must address potential variability and provide consistent, reliable results. These procedures should align with recognized standards, such as ISO 17025, to ensure their scientific rigor.

By standardizing the approach to method validation and verification, the FDA aims to improve the reliability of data used in regulatory submissions, enabling more efficient reviews and promoting public health. For manufacturers, adhering to this guidance is crucial not only for regulatory compliance but also for maintaining the credibility of their submissions.

The guidance also reflects the FDA's broader mission to ensure the safety and transparency of tobacco products, particularly in the context of evolving regulatory challenges. For stakeholders, this underscores the importance of investing in robust analytical capabilities and maintaining a proactive approach to compliance. In an industry where data integrity is paramount, this guidance serves as both a roadmap and a benchmark for quality and reliability.

As the regulatory landscape for tobacco products continues to evolve, this guidance represents a critical step in fostering consistency and accountability in the evaluation of these products. Stakeholders that align their practices with the FDA's recommendations will be better positioned to navigate regulatory complexities and contribute to public health objectives.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More