ARTICLE
25 March 2021

Biden Administration Abandons Trump-Era Public Charge Rule

OD
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart

Contributor

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart logo
Ogletree Deakins is a labor and employment law firm representing management in all types of employment-related legal matters. Ogletree Deakins has more than 850 attorneys located in 53 offices across the United States and in Europe, Canada, and Mexico. The firm represents a range of clients, from small businesses to Fortune 50 companies.
n March 9, 2021, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced that the Biden administration would no longer enforce the 2019 public charge rule implemented by the Trump administration.
United States Immigration
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart are most popular:
  • with readers working within the Environment & Waste Management industries

On March 9, 2021, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced that the Biden administration would no longer enforce the 2019 public charge rule implemented by the Trump administration.

DHS Secretary Alejandro N. Mayorkas stated that the 2019 public charge rule was unfair to individuals who "access health benefits and other government services available to them" and "was not in keeping with our nation's values." Further, Secretary Mayorkas said that additional reforms would be evaluated and implemented as the Biden administration seeks to improve the legal immigration system in the United States.

Following this announcement, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) noted that applicants seeking lawful permanent resident (i.e., green card) status are no longer required to submit Form I-944, Declaration of Self-Sufficiency, and the related supporting materials with their applications. In addition, USCIS stated that it would immediately cease "applying the [2019] Public Charge Final Rule to all pending applications and petitions." Instead, USCIS will revert to the 1999 interim field guidance and only apply the public charge inadmissibility provision. The reversion to prior policy means the "public charge" ground of inadmissibility applies only to persons who might become "primarily dependent" on designated state and federal programs for more than half of their income or support. USCIS will also no longer apply the "public benefits condition" to applications or petitions for nonimmigrant extension and change of status filings.

If an applicant has received a Request for Evidence solely related to the public charge issue, a response may not be required. Applicants may want to carefully review such requests.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More