ARTICLE
27 January 2011

Red Flags Rule Revised Again

LH
Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren

Contributor

Larkin Hoffman provides counsel to a wide variety of organizations, from small businesses and nonprofits to Fortune 500 companies, in many areas of practice including corporate and governance matters, litigation, real estate, government relations, labor and employment, intellectual property, information technology, franchising and taxation. The firm also serves the needs of individuals in many areas including trusts and estates and family law.

We are an entrepreneurial law firm with a vibrant practice. Our attorneys’ doors are open for collaboration in a friendly and professional atmosphere. We nurture client relationships through exceptional service, teamwork and creativity even as we work remotely. We are a firm, not merely a collection of individuals practicing law under the same roof. This spirit of cooperation – among attorneys and staff – is a key element of our firm culture.

A new bill was signed into law at the end of 2010, providing clarification to the controversial Red Flags Rule. The Red Flag Program Clarification Act of 2010 was adopted on December 18, 2010, in order to clarify the application of the law and eliminate confusion over the types of businesses that are subject to it.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law

A new bill was signed into law at the end of 2010, providing clarification to the controversial Red Flags Rule. The Red Flag Program Clarification Act of 2010 was adopted on December 18, 2010, in order to clarify the application of the law and eliminate confusion over the types of businesses that are subject to it. The Red Flags Rule is regulated by the Federal Trade Commission, which has previously announced that enforcement of the law was to begin on December 31, 2010.

The Red Flags Rule generally applies to businesses that fall under the definition of a "creditor." The Red Flag Program Clarification Act of 2010 limits the definition of a "creditor" under the law to those entities that use consumer reports, furnish information to consumer reporting agencies, or advance funds to or on behalf of a person, based on an obligation of that person to repay the funds. In addition, the new law exempts creditors that advance funds on behalf of a person for expenses incidental to a service provided by the creditor to that person.

The effect of this clarifying act is that professionals and businesses that provide products and services in advance and require payment at a later time are not required to comply with the Red Flags Rule. Franchisors that provide services to franchisees and then bill later for these services would also not fall under the definition of a "creditor" solely because of that practice.

However, franchisors that provide or arrange for financing on behalf of franchisees may still be subject to the Red Flags Rule. In addition, language in the new law retains the right of the FTC to find application of the law to a creditor if it determines there is a "reasonably foreseeable risk" of identity theft. For that reason, franchisors should be aware of the law and its requirements to determine whether it might apply to their business. Contact a member of Larkin Hoffman's Franchise and Distribution Practice Group with questions about the Red Flags Rule.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More