ARTICLE
27 September 2018

Board Diversity And The Skills Matrix

SS
Shearman & Sterling LLP

Contributor

Our success is built on our clients’ success. We have a long and distinguished history of supporting our clients wherever they do business, from major financial centers to emerging and growth markets. We represent many of the world’s leading corporations and major financial institutions, as well as emerging growth companies, governments and state-owned enterprises, often working on ground-breaking, precedent-setting matters. With a deep understanding of our clients' businesses and the industries they operate in, our work is driven by their need for outstanding legal and commercial advice.
The second phase, which focused on those companies that had adopted proxy access, was designed to use the threat of proxy access to force companies to engage in a discussion on board diversity.
United States Finance and Banking

In September 2017, the New York City Comptroller (NYCC) launched the Boardroom Accountability Project 2.0 – an initiative that was designed to put pressure on large public companies to "refresh" their boards to make them "more diverse, independent and climate-competent."

The initial phase of the Boardroom Accountability Project, launched in 2014, focused on bringing proxy access to the mainstream, and, coupled with significant support from other institutional investors, fueled the dramatic increase in the adoption of proxy access by-laws over the last three years. The second phase, which focused on those companies that had adopted (or will soon adopt) proxy access, was designed to use the threat of proxy access to force companies to engage in a discussion on board diversity.

In connection with the second phase, the NYCC sent letters to the chairs of the nominating and governance committees of 151 U.S. public companies asking them to:

Boardroom Accountability Project 2.0

  • Provide the NYCC with enhanced disclosure in the proxy outlining each director's race/ethnicity, gender and sexual orientation, along with each director's skills and experience in a matrix format
  • Engage in a discussion directly with the NYCC on board refreshment, including reviewing the company's director matrix
  • Facilitate the NYCC's involvement in the board's process to identify potential director candidates

Read this section of the 2018 Corporate Governance Survey.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More