GAO Calls On Congress To Rationalize Financial Regulatory Structure

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
GAO also called on Congress to consider whether aligning the authority of the Financial Stability Oversight Council with its mission to respond to systemic risks necessitates legislative changes.
United States Finance and Banking
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In its annual report, the Government Accountability Office ("GAO") encouraged Congress to make legislative changes to the financial regulatory structure in order to improve (i) the efficiency and effectiveness of oversight, (ii) the parity between consumer and investor protections, and (iii) the consistency of financial oversight for similar institutions, products, risks and services. GAO also called on Congress to consider whether aligning the authority of the Financial Stability Oversight Council with its mission to respond to systemic risks necessitates legislative changes.

The GAO report covers a range of governmental functions. Regulation of financial services is discussed on pages 7-8 and, in more detail, at pages 63-71. According to the GAO, "a pattern of inconsistencies and inefficiencies . . . continue[s] to persist because of the fragmented regulatory structure" (at page 65).

Commentary

The GAO Report focused on government expenditure and regulatory fragmentation. Implicit in the Report is that such fragmentation has an enormous cost for the private sector. Examiners from different agencies investigated the same institution for what is essentially the same activity. The result was minimal differences between regulators’ assessments of near-identical products for roughly twice the cost.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

GAO Calls On Congress To Rationalize Financial Regulatory Structure

United States Finance and Banking

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More