ARTICLE
6 August 2025

CFPB Terminates Consent Order Against Credit Union Early

SM
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton

Contributor

Sheppard Mullin is a full service Global 100 firm with over 1,000 attorneys in 16 offices located in the United States, Europe and Asia. Since 1927, companies have turned to Sheppard Mullin to handle corporate and technology matters, high stakes litigation and complex financial transactions. In the US, the firm’s clients include more than half of the Fortune 100.
On July 18, the CFPB terminated a 2024 consent order against a credit union after concluding that the entity had satisfied certain monetary and compliance-related requirements.
United States Finance and Banking

Listen to this post

On July 18, the CFPB terminated a 2024 consent order against a credit union after concluding that the entity had satisfied certain monetary and compliance-related requirements. The original order, issued in October 2024, alleged violations of the Consumer Financial Protection Act arising from the credit union's 2022 banking platform conversion, which left members unable to access their online and mobile accounts for extended periods of time.

According to the Bureau, the credit union fulfilled "certain obligations," including payment of a $1.5 million civil money penalty and implementation of partial redress. The credit union conducted an audit to confirm refunds for members who submitted requests, but the Bureau did not state whether consumers eligible for reimbursement but who failed to file claims received any redress. The termination also waived any alleged non-compliance with the order's redress or audit provisions.

The CFPB formally ended the consent order ahead of schedule and waived ongoing oversight requirements, including monitoring and reporting obligations.

Putting It Into Practice: This termination is part of a growing trend under current CFPB leadership to roll back or end prior enforcement orders before their scheduled expiration dates (previously discussed here and here). Financial institutions operating under consent orders may reassess their compliance strategies in light of this evolving approach but should remain prepared for possible shifts in enforcement rigor under future leadership.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More