ARTICLE
20 January 2021

House Financial Services Committee Chair Urges President-Elect To Suspend Midnight Rulemakings

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
House Committee on Financial Services Chair Maxine Waters (D-CA) urged President-Elect Joseph Biden to issue a Presidential Memorandum that would temporarily suspend midnight rulemaking actions by the Trump administration.
United States Finance and Banking

House Committee on Financial Services Chair Maxine Waters (D-CA) urged President-Elect Joseph Biden to issue a Presidential Memorandum that would temporarily suspend midnight rulemaking actions by the Trump administration. Representative Waters requested that the independent agencies, including the CFPB, the SEC, the OCC, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, the National Credit Union Administration, and the Federal Reserve Board, (i) not send proposed or final rules to the Office of the Register, (ii) withdraw unpublished rules in the Federal Register and (iii) postpone by at least 60 days the effective date of rules that have been published in the Federal Register, but have not yet taken effect.

Commentary

The term "midnight rulemaking" refers to the rush by an outgoing administration to adopt rules before a new administration comes into office. According to GAO, such rulemaking is quite common, but in some cases may reflect noncompliance with administrative law requirements. See, e.g., GAO Report on Federal Rulemaking (March 2018) at page 22 (finding that a significant percentage of midnight rulemakings at the end of the Obama administration did not comply with the Congressional Review Act, which contains additional procedural requirements applicable to "major rules," defined as including rules having an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more).

There are a variety of ways in which a new President's administration can seek to undo rules adopted by a prior administration. See CRS Report: Can a New Administration Undo a Previous Administration's Regulation?

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More