ARTICLE
23 January 2013

Home Court Advantage - Employees Cannot Bring LAD Claims Unless They Work In NJ

DP
Day Pitney LLP

Contributor

Day Pitney LLP logo
Day Pitney LLP is a full-service law firm with more than 300 attorneys in Boston, Connecticut, Florida, New Jersey, New York and Washington, DC. The firm offers clients strong corporate and litigation practices, with experience on behalf of large national and international corporations as well as emerging and middle-market companies. With one of the largest individual clients practices on the East Coast, the firm also has extensive experience assisting individuals and their families, fiduciaries and tax-exempt entities plan for the future.
The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, in "McGovern v. Southwest Airlines", recently reinforced the rule that employees can only bring claims under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination ("LAD") if they work in New Jersey.
United States Employment and HR

The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, in McGovern v. Southwest Airlines, recently reinforced the rule that employees can only bring claims under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination ("LAD") if they work in New Jersey. In this case, the plaintiff, who lived in New Jersey, worked as a Ramp Supervisor for Southwest Airlines at the Philadelphia International Airport. The plaintiff alleged that he received harassing and homophobic phone calls and text messages while he was at home in New Jersey.

The Court dismissed the case because the plaintiff worked exclusively in Philadelphia and the LAD only applies to employees who work in New Jersey. The Court disagreed with the plaintiff's argument that the LAD should apply because the harassment extended into New Jersey when he received harassing phone calls, threats, and text messages while at his home in New Jersey.

This decision reinforces the notion that an employee cannot bring a LAD claim if he or she does not work in New Jersey. Out-of-state employees have only been able to sue under the LAD when they have significant employment responsibilities in New Jersey. This case is good news for New Jersey employers with offices in multiple states.

Originally published on the Employer's Law Blog

www.daypitney.com

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More