ARTICLE
1 September 2026

PART 2 – EEOC Enforcement: The Risk Has Not Gone Away

HR
HR Unlimited

Contributor

HR Unlimited, Inc. (HRU) is a premier total solutions provider of human resource outsourcing services including Anti-Discrimination/Affirmative Action Compliance, Applicants Tracking Systems, Talent Acquisition (Job Distribution), Compensation Benchmarking, Training, and more. We help organizations confidently nationwide navigating complex federal, state, and local requirements, while extending our impact from compliance to culture to support the full employee life cycle. Our mission is to help clients simplify complexity, strengthen their people strategies, and create thriving workplaces where compliance, performance, and culture align for lasting success.
The revocation of Executive Order 11246 transformed federal contractor compliance, but enforcement risk remains very much alive. While OFCCP has ceased its investigative activities, the EEOC continues aggressive Title VII enforcement with recent settlements totaling millions of dollars. Federal contractors now face a complex enforcement landscape where discrimination claims can arise from multiple directions including EEOC actions, employee complaints, and new federal contract requirements.
United States Illinois Employment and HR
Ahmed Younies’s articles from HR Unlimited are most popular:
  • with readers working within the Business & Consumer Services and Consumer Industries industries

The revocation of Executive Order 11246 significantly changed the federal contractor compliance landscape, but it did not eliminate employers’ underlying nondiscrimination obligations or enforcement risk.

While OFCCP has ceased investigative and enforcement activity under the former EO 11246 program, the EEOC continues to actively enforce Title VII, including cases involving race discrimination in hiring, promotions, compensation, work assignments, harassment, terminations and other terms and conditions of employment.

Recent enforcement actions demonstrate that the financial consequences can be significant.


Recent EEOC Race Discrimination Settlements


Since August 2025, the EEOC has announced monetary resolutions involving allegations or findings of race discrimination, including:

R&R Janitorial, Painting & Building Services — $1.25 Million The federal contractor agreed to settle an EEOC lawsuit alleging race and national-origin discrimination involving Hispanic janitorial workers.

Planned Parenthood of Illinois — $500,000 The EEOC resolved a DEI-related race discrimination investigation involving allegations of race-based segregation, harassment, and disparate treatment in terms, conditions and privileges of employment.

Sunnybrook Union — $110,000 The EEOC alleged that a Black employee was denied a promotion because of his race.

Metro Eighteen — $70,098 The settlement resolved allegations involving racial harassment and retaliation against a Black employee.

Epiq Food Hall — $54,000 The company resolved an EEOC racial harassment lawsuit involving a Black manager.

These cases reinforce an important point:

The enforcement framework has changed. The risk of discrimination claims has not.

Federal contractors now operate in an environment where EEOC Title VII enforcement continues while EO 14398 and FAR 52.222-90 add a contractual nondiscrimination dimension to federal procurement.

Potential exposure can therefore arise from multiple directions:

  • EEOC Enforcement
  • Employee Complaints
  • Federal Contract Requirements
  • Contracting Officer Inquiries
  • False Claims Act Considerations
  • Suspension or Debarment

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More