ARTICLE
7 September 2016

IRS Says Employees Of Disregarded Single-Member LLC May Participate In Parent's 403(B) And 457(B) Plans

SS
Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Contributor

With more than 900 lawyers across 18 offices, Seyfarth Shaw LLP provides advisory, litigation, and transactional legal services to clients worldwide. Our high-caliber legal representation and advanced delivery capabilities allow us to take on our clients’ unique challenges and opportunities-no matter the scale or complexity. Whether navigating complex litigation, negotiating transformational deals, or advising on cross-border projects, our attorneys achieve exceptional legal outcomes. Our drive for excellence leads us to seek out better ways to work with our clients and each other. We have been first-to-market on many legal service delivery innovations-and we continue to break new ground with our clients every day. This long history of excellence and innovation has created a culture with a sense of purpose and belonging for all. In turn, our culture drives our commitment to the growth of our clients, the diversity of our people, and the resilience of our workforce.
A recently published IRS memorandum provides that employees of a single-member LLC treated as a disregarded entity must be allowed to participate in a section 403(b) plan...
United States Employment and HR

Seyfarth Synopsis: A recently published IRS memorandum provides that employees of a single-member LLC treated as a disregarded entity must be allowed to participate in a section 403(b) plan sponsored by its parent 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization.  The LLC may also be allowed to participate in a 457(b) plan sponsored by such a parent. 

New IRS guidance holds that employees of a single-member LLC treated as a disregarded entity of a section 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization must be allowed to participate in a 403(b) plan sponsored by the 501(c)(3) organization if the plan permits elective deferrals. The IRS reasoned that a disregarded entity is treated as a branch of the member organization. Thus, where the sole member of the disregarded single-member LLC is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt entity that maintains a 403(b) retirement plan for its own employees, it must also allow employees of the disregarded entity to make elective deferrals under the "universal availability" rule under section 403(b) (unless the LLC employees are covered under another cash or deferred arrangement of the entity).

Similarly, the IRS stated that employees of a single-member LLC treated as a disregarded entity of a tax-exempt organization are permitted to participate in a section 457(b) plan sponsored by the member organization. Because section 457(b) plans are not subject to the same universal availability rules as section 403(b) plans, participation of the LLC employees in a section 457(b) plan is not required. 

What does the new memorandum mean for tax-exempt employers who maintain a 403(b) plan providing for elective deferrals and also have employees in a single-member LLC?  Memoranda are not formal guidance, but they do provide insight as to the IRS' perspective.  IRS regulations under section 403(b) currently provide that a "subsidiary or affiliate" of an eligible employer must itself qualify as an eligible employer itself (i.e., be a tax-exempt entity) to maintain a 403(b) plan. Based on this regulation, many tax-exempt employers have taken the position that employees of a single-member LLC treated as a disregarded entity could not participate in its parent's 403(b) plan. In the memorandum, the IRS has "clarified" that a single-member LLC should be viewed as a branch of its parent organization, rather than as a "subsidiary or affiliate" for 403(b) purposes.  Under this guidance, most tax-exempt employers will want to review and amend their 403(b) plans to take into account employees of a single-member disregarded entity in order to assure compliance with section 403(b)'s universal availability rule.

The IRS has yet to address whether the memorandum's interpretation will be enforced retroactively. If the memorandum applies retroactively, it is possible that further corrective action may be required with respect to plans that have violated the universal availability requirement by omitting employees of a single-member LLC treated as a disregarded entity who are not otherwise covered by another cash or deferred arrangement.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More