ARTICLE
3 December 2014

Tenth Circuit Finds Plan Administrator Has No Duty To Inquire Into Authenticity Of Participant’s Beneficiary Designation

PR
Proskauer Rose LLP

Contributor

The world’s leading organizations and global players choose Proskauer to represent them when they need it the most. Our top tier team of star trial attorneys, acclaimed transactional lawyers and exceptionally talented partners and associates have earned a reputation for the relentless pursuit of perfection and a dauntless pursuit of success.
Plaintiff Kristopher Towles, challenged the plan’s decision to pay the life insurance proceeds to the deceased’s husband, contending that the beneficiary form replacing him with the deceased husband had been forged.
United States Employment and HR

Plaintiff Kristopher Towles, the son of a deceased participant of a life insurance plan, challenged the plan's decision to pay the life insurance proceeds to the deceased's husband, contending that the beneficiary form replacing him with the deceased husband had been forged. After five attempts to state a claim, the district court dismissed the complaint for failure to plead a viable claim. The Tenth Circuit affirmed and further noted that Kristopher's allegations that the forms were forged failed to state a claim under ERISA because a plan administrator has no duty to inquire into the authenticity of the forms if it had "no reason to suspect that anything was amiss." The case is Yarbary v. Martin, Pringle, Oliver, Wallace & Bauer, LLP, No. 14-3101, 2014 WL 6679881 (10th Cir. Nov. 24, 2014).

Tenth Circuit Finds Plan Administrator Has No Duty to Inquire into Authenticity of Participant's Beneficiary Designation

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More