Most business owners treat arbitration clauses as boilerplate — something to paste in at the end of a contract without much thought. That is a mistake. An arbitration clause is not just a provision; it is a self-contained legal framework that determines how every future dispute between the parties will be resolved. It is, in the language of arbitration law, a contract within a contract.
The Separability Doctrine: Why the Arbitration Clause Stands Alone
Under the separability doctrine — established by the U.S. Supreme Court and applied in both New Jersey and New York — an arbitration clause is treated as legally independent from the contract in which it appears. This has significant practical consequences. Even if a party argues that the underlying contract is void, fraudulent, or unenforceable, that argument generally does not automatically invalidate the arbitration clause. The validity of the arbitration agreement itself is a separate question, typically decided by the arbitrator rather than a court.
This means that a poorly drafted arbitration clause can bind you to a process you never intended — even in a dispute where you are challenging the contract itself.
What an Arbitration Clause Can (and Should) Address
A well-tailored arbitration clause is not a one-size-fits-all provision. It can be customized across several dimensions:
Which disputes are covered. An arbitration clause can be broad — covering all disputes arising out of or relating to the agreement — or narrow, carving out certain categories (injunctive relief, IP disputes, collections under a threshold) for litigation. The scope matters enormously, and vague language creates ambiguity that courts and arbitrators have to resolve.
Which rules govern. Most commercial arbitration clauses specify a set of administering rules. The American Arbitration Association (AAA) Commercial Arbitration Rules are among the most widely used. The AAA also provides a standard arbitration clause on its website that you can adapt. Other options include JAMS rules (often used in larger disputes), ICC rules (common in international contracts), or ad hoc arbitration without an administering institution. Each has different fee structures, procedural requirements, and timelines.
Dispute size thresholds. Arbitration can be expensive for small disputes — filing fees alone can exceed the amount in controversy. A well-drafted clause can tier the process: small claims below a threshold might go to a single arbitrator on written submissions only, while larger disputes trigger a full hearing. The AAA has streamlined rules specifically for smaller commercial disputes.
Written submissions vs. live hearings. Not every dispute needs a hearing. For document-intensive commercial disputes, a clause providing for arbitration on written submissions — briefs, declarations, and exhibits without live testimony — can dramatically reduce cost and time. This should be a deliberate choice, not an afterthought.
Confidentiality. Arbitration is private, but privacy is not automatic. A well-drafted clause should expressly require that the existence of the arbitration, all submissions, and the award remain confidential. This protects both parties from the reputational and commercial risks of public litigation.
Seat of arbitration. The seat — the legal place of arbitration — determines which jurisdiction’s procedural law governs the process and which courts have supervisory jurisdiction. For New Jersey and New York businesses, specifying a seat in New Jersey or New York keeps the process local and familiar. In contracts with international counterparties, seat selection is especially significant.
Number of arbitrators. A single arbitrator is faster and less expensive. A three-arbitrator panel provides more deliberation and reduces the risk of an outlier decision, but adds cost and time. The right answer depends on the size and complexity of the disputes you anticipate.
Fee allocation. Who pays the arbitrator’s fees? The default under most rules is that the costs are shared, but the clause can shift fees to the losing party or to the party that initiated a frivolous claim. Fee-shifting provisions can be a powerful deterrent against bad-faith disputes.
The Copy-Paste Problem
Many arbitration clauses in commercial contracts are copied from a prior agreement, pulled from the internet, or taken from an AAA template without modification. This is not always wrong — a standard AAA clause is a reasonable starting point. But it is only a starting point. The clause that worked for a software licensing agreement may be entirely inappropriate for a commercial real estate contract, a staffing agency agreement, or a business purchase transaction. The size of the disputes, the nature of the relationship, the sophistication of the parties, and the governing law all bear on what the clause should say.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
[View Source]