ARTICLE
10 December 2024

Preliminary Injunction Halts Corporate Transparency Act Enforcement

SR
Shulman Rogers

Contributor

Shulman Rogers is a full-service law firm with its principal office located in Potomac, Maryland and branch offices in Tysons Corner, Virginia, Alexandria, Virginia and Washington, D.C. Today, with 110+ attorneys, 30 legal assistants and more than 50 other staff and support personnel, the firm is organized into five general operating departments: real estate, business & financial services, litigation, medical malpractice/personal injury and trusts & estates.
On December 3, 2024, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a preliminary injunction temporarily halting enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA)...
United States Texas Corporate/Commercial Law

On December 3, 2024, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a preliminary injunction temporarily halting enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) and staying the compliance deadline of January 1, 2025 (Texas Top Cop Shop v. Garland (E.D. Tex.)). The court determined that Congress likely exceeded its constitutional authority in passing the CTA, and that the rules promulgated by FinCEN with respect to the CTA are therefore likely unconstitutional.

The result of this ruling is that the CTA is temporarily unenforceable on a nationwide basis until the conclusion of the proceedings in the case.

We expect that the government will appeal this ruling shortly and will at a minimum attempt to narrow the decision to apply only to the plaintiffs in the case. Whether a ruling comes before the January 1, 2025 CTA filing deadline is not certain. It is also not certain that FinCEN will adopt a grace period for late filings due to any confusion or delays related to the injunction .

We understand why companies may want to delay CTA filings they had intended to make before the deadline. Nevertheless, we recommend that companies complete preparations in anticipation of a filing should the ruling be overturned.

We will keep you apprised of any important developments as this case proceeds.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More