ARTICLE
28 January 2015

Global Anti-Bribery Year-in-Review: 2014 Developments and Predictions for 2015

W
WilmerHale

Contributor

WilmerHale provides legal representation across a comprehensive range of practice areas critical to the success of its clients. With a staunch commitment to public service, the firm is a leader in pro bono representation. WilmerHale is 1,000 lawyers strong with 12 offices in the United States, Europe and Asia.
The year 2014 witnessed several notable developments in the enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA).
Worldwide Criminal Law

The year 2014 saw significant anti-bribery developments, despite an overall decline in the number of FCPA actions commenced. The year brought the biggest single criminal penalty and second-highest total aggregate monetary penalty in the history of FCPA enforcement and, as we predicted in last year's review, included three "blockbuster" corporate resolutions—against Alstom, Alcoa, and Avon. This year also had the first circuit court ruling on what constitutes an "instrumentality" of a foreign government under the FCPA. A number of other developments are affecting the way that companies and individuals confront compliance with the FCPA and related internal and governmental investigations.

This annual review analyzes the noteworthy developments from 2014 related to FCPA and anti-bribery enforcement. Section I highlights enforcement trends and what they suggest about the priorities of the US Department of Justice ("DOJ") and Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Section II focuses on notable features of the year's corporate resolutions. Section III analyzes important developments related to enforcement efforts against individuals. Section IV examines how enforcement agencies and courts are interpreting and applying the FCPA, while Section V focuses on how those agencies investigate alleged violations. Section VI assesses developments in collateral areas of the law related to FCPA enforcement. In our last section, we note developments in key foreign jurisdictions.

Download the full pdf of this alert

The overall editors of this review were Lillian H. Potter (Washington DC) and Eric Rahn (Washington DC). The contributors were Paul von Hehn (Brussels), Kenneth Zhou (Beijing), Christopher David (London), Jeanne Gellman (Los Angeles), Tiffany Payne (Washington DC), Elly Proudlock (London), Katherine M. Shiu (Washington DC), Patrick Spaeth (Berlin), Laura Chester (Washington DC), William Durkin (Boston), Sarah Ganslein (Washington DC), Tetyana Gaponenko (New York), Alison Geary (London), Darren Griffis (Boston), Rebecca Haciski (Washington DC), John Hare (Boston), Pablo Kapusta (New York), Nicole Mansker (Washington DC), Andrew Mendrala (Washington DC), Chavi Keeney Nana (New York), Larkin Reynolds (New York), David Rundle (London), Autumn Anderson (Palo Alto), Jared Cohen (Boston), Rommy Flores (Palo Alto), Laura Goodall (Palo Alto), Tingting Liu (Beijing), David Peer (Los Angeles), Silvana Quintanilla (Palo Alto), Michael Roach (London), Emily Stark (Washington DC), Sarah Zarrabi (Los Angeles), and Elaine Zhong (Los Angeles).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More