ARTICLE
20 October 2020

PE Funds Are Not Part Of Controlled Group; What About Your Company?

DW
Dickinson Wright PLLC
Contributor
Dickinson Wright is a general practice business law firm with more than 475 attorneys among more than 40 practice areas and 16 industry groups. With 19 offices across the U.S. and in Toronto, we offer clients exceptional quality and client service, value for fees, industry expertise and business acumen.
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court denied a request to review the First Circuit Court of Appeals decision in the Sun Capital Partners III, LP v. New England Teamsters...
United States Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court denied a request to review the First Circuit Court of Appeals decision in the Sun Capital Partners III, LP v. New England Teamsters and Trucking Industry Pension Fund case, thereby confirming the Appeals Court's decision that the two separate Sun Capital private equity funds were not under common control with a portfolio company and therefore were not a controlled group as defined in Code Section 414. As a result of the decision, neither fund is liable to the multiemployer pension fund for $4.5 million of withdrawal liability owed by Scott Brass Inc.

While this decision is good news for private equity funds that follow a structure similar to that used by the Sun Capital Partners funds, it is a reminder of the high stakes involved when companies are found to be part of a controlled group. At its heart, the controlled group rule requires that all employees of the controlled group members be treated as if they were employed by one employer when:

  • determining if members of the controlled group can offer separate 401(k) plans to their employees. Each such plan must pass the Code Section 410(b) coverage rules and the Code Section 401(a)(4) non-discrimination rules on a controlled group basis.
  • determining if a member is a large employer for purposes of the Affordable Care Act. Employees of non-US members do not count for ACA purposes.
  • determining if a member has 20 or more employees on a typical business day during the preceding calendar year and therefore must offer COBRA continuation coverage to terminated employees. Employees of non-US members count for COBRA purposes.
  • determining whether one member may make employer contributions to the Health Savings Accounts of its employees if other members do not make similar contributions.

A previous tax blog provides an overview of the ownership rules that can cause one legal entity to be part of a controlled group with another entity. Companies that may be part of a controlled group should talk to experienced benefits counsel about these rules.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

ARTICLE
20 October 2020

PE Funds Are Not Part Of Controlled Group; What About Your Company?

United States Corporate/Commercial Law
Contributor
Dickinson Wright is a general practice business law firm with more than 475 attorneys among more than 40 practice areas and 16 industry groups. With 19 offices across the U.S. and in Toronto, we offer clients exceptional quality and client service, value for fees, industry expertise and business acumen.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More