United States:
Warhol Case Could ‘Rein Back' Courts On Transformative Use: Counsel
29 May 2023
Morrison & Foerster LLP
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
Joe Gratz and Roman Swoopes discussed the U.S. Supreme Court
ruling in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v.
Goldsmith that an Andy Warhol print derived from a photograph of
the late musician Prince violated copyrights held by the original
photographer, Lynn Goldsmith.
Read the full article (subscription required).
Because of the generality of this update, the information
provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should
not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular
situations.
© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Intellectual Property from United States
Are Your NDAs Up To Date?
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
Nondisclosure agreements (NDAs) can be used to protect companies' confi dential and trade secret information. But you should resist the urge to have a vendor...
Legal Implications Of New York Times vs. OpenAI
BoyarMiller
The New York Times recently filed a landmark lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft, accusing them of copyright infringement in the training of the chatbot ChatGPT which launched just over a year ago.
