ARTICLE
24 March 2023

EPA Proposes First-Ever National Standard For PFAS In Drinking Water

SS
Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Contributor

With more than 900 lawyers across 18 offices, Seyfarth Shaw LLP provides advisory, litigation, and transactional legal services to clients worldwide. Our high-caliber legal representation and advanced delivery capabilities allow us to take on our clients’ unique challenges and opportunities-no matter the scale or complexity. Whether navigating complex litigation, negotiating transformational deals, or advising on cross-border projects, our attorneys achieve exceptional legal outcomes. Our drive for excellence leads us to seek out better ways to work with our clients and each other. We have been first-to-market on many legal service delivery innovations-and we continue to break new ground with our clients every day. This long history of excellence and innovation has created a culture with a sense of purpose and belonging for all. In turn, our culture drives our commitment to the growth of our clients, the diversity of our people, and the resilience of our workforce.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) has announced that it is proposing the first-ever national drinking water standard for six per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)...
United States Environment

Seyfarth Synopsis: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) has announced that it is proposing the first-ever national drinking water standard for six per - and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in the latest action under President Biden's plan to combat PFAS pollution and the EPA PFAS Strategic Roadmap.

Through its proposed rule, EPA seeks to establish legally enforceable levels for six PFAS in drinking water. The proposed rule follows EPA's prior proposals to designate two PFAS as hazardous substances under CERCLA and to use the Clean Water Act permitting and regulatory programs to enforce cleanup of PFAS pollution in the drinking water. The proposal however is fraught with issues.

While according to the Biden Administration, the proposal is intended to be another step in "EPA's Strategic Roadmap", and EPA Administrator Michael S. Regan is touting the proposal as a means to "...provide states with the guidance they need to make decisions that best protect their communities...", some states have already introduced measures to limit PFAS (at more reasonable levels than proposed by EPA) and while EPA's proposal ostensibly is intended to build on such existing state initiatives, it is more likely, in current form, to merely stall such initiatives as states struggle to determine how to conform their programs to meet EPA's new limits.

The proposed new rule creates significant concerns for public water supplies (at present it does not apply to private water supplies or residential wells) as it would mean that if a public water system determines that PFAS exist in drinking water at or above the proposed levels, the existing drinking water system would need to be retrofitted, or alternatively a new drinking water system will need to be installed. Some communities would need to consider switching to a different water source. All options are costly and create challenges for communities already struggling to meet federal drinking water limits. (Note, there are limited funds and grants available to communities under the Infrastructure Law for disadvantaged communities and small communities of less than 25,000 people, but it is unclear how and when those funds may be allocated.) For these reasons, the levels set by EPA will be critically challenged, and are unlikely to survive public notice and comment in their current form because of the cost.

If finalized, the proposal, as detailed in EPA's FAQs, would regulate PFOA and PFOS as individual contaminants, and will regulate four other PFAS - PFNA, PFHxS, PFBS, and GenX Chemicals - as a mixture. A hearing is to be held on the rulemaking at www.regulations.gov, identified by Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OW-2022-0114, on May 4, 2023, at which the public will be invited to provide EPA with verbal comments. For more information on this or any related topic please contact the authors, your Seyfarth attorney, or any member of the Seyfarth Workplace Safety and EnvironmentalTeam.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More