ARTICLE
4 September 2023

Lane Powell Files Petition For Certiorari To SCOTUS Regarding Washington Capital Gains Tax

BS
Ballard Spahr LLP

Contributor

We provide strategic legal services and business solutions of the highest quality, delivered with uncommon efficiency.

With more than 750 lawyers in 18 U.S. offices, we bring industry knowledge augmented by tenacity, initiative, and a drive for results—creating an outsized advantage for clients in litigation, transactions, and regulatory compliance.

On Monday, August 21, Lane Powell filed a petition for certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) asking the Court to review the Washington State Supreme Court decision in Quinn v. Dep't of Revenue.
United States California Washington Tax

On Monday, August 21, Lane Powell filed a petition for certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) asking the Court to review the Washington State Supreme Court decision in Quinn v. Dep't of Revenue.

The petition asks SCOTUS to address the constitutional flaws with the Washington capital gains tax resulting from the state Supreme Court's ruling that the tax is an excise tax. By explicitly calling the capital gains tax an excise tax, the Washington Supreme Court created a federal law problem. The federal problem is two-fold: (1) The decision violates the U.S. Constitution by allowing the state to tax transactions that occur outside of the state's borders; and (2) the decision conflicts with Ninth Circuit precedence, San Francis Foundation v. Christie's, Inc., where the Court of Appeals invalidated a California law that required the seller of a work of art to pay the artist a percentage of the sale price even if that sale took place entirely in another state if the seller was a California resident. Washington with its capital gain tax is similarly — and impermissibly — attempting to tax transactions that occur entirely in other states simply because it involves a Washington resident.

For this case to be heard, four of the nine Justices must agree to accept the case. This case is worthy of the Court's time and attention due to its significant, national impact.

Stay tuned for more updates.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More