ARTICLE
24 August 2017

The Emergency Arbitrator Provisions In The ICC Arbitration Rules

MW
McDermott Will & Emery

Contributor

McDermott Will & Emery partners with leaders around the world to fuel missions, knock down barriers and shape markets. With more than 1,100 lawyers across several office locations worldwide, our team works seamlessly across practices, industries and geographies to deliver highly effective solutions that propel success.
These provisions render ICC arbitration more attractive than certain other forms of arbitration as they avoid potential vacuums of jurisdiction.
United States Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The ICC's current version of the rules of arbitration ("2017 ICC Rules"), which came into effect on March 1, 2017, include "Emergency Arbitrator Provisions" providing for urgent interim measures by a so-called "emergency arbitrator." Such measures, which include preserving the status quo and conserving evidence, can be ordered by the emergency arbitrator in circumstances where the full arbitral tribunal has not been constituted and is therefore not itself empowered to order such measures. These provisions render ICC arbitration more attractive than certain other forms of arbitration as they avoid potential vacuums of jurisdiction.

Read More Here (English) | Read More Here (Japanese)

The Emergency Arbitrator Provisions In The ICC Arbitration Rules

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More