ARTICLE
2 October 2026

SpaceX’s Novel Shareholder Dispute-Resolution Bylaws Could Have Far-Reaching Implications (Podcast)

BS
Ballard Spahr LLP

Contributor

Ballard Spahr LLP—an Am Law 100 law firm with more than 750 lawyers in 18 U.S. offices—serves clients across industries in litigation, transactions, and regulatory compliance. A strategic legal partner to clients, Ballard goes beyond to deliver actionable, forward-thinking counsel and advocacy powered by deep industry experience and an understanding of each client’s specific business goals. Our culture is defined by an entrepreneurial spirit, collaborative environment, and top-down focus on service, efficiency, and results.
SpaceX's record-breaking IPO introduced an unusually comprehensive shareholder dispute-resolution regime in its bylaws, raising significant legal questions at the intersection of corporate law, federal arbitration policy, and securities regulation. Professor Mohsen Manesh joins the Consumer Finance Monitor podcast to analyze this novel framework and explore how eventual litigation could reshape shareholder dispute resolution for years to come.
United States Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The SpaceX IPO generated enormous attention for obvious reasons. It was the largest IPO in history, and the company’s stock price initially surged after trading began. But an important legal development associated with the IPO has received considerably less attention: SpaceX adopted an unusually comprehensive shareholder dispute-resolution regime (the “Regime”) in its bylaws.

In our Consumer Finance Monitor podcast released today, our host, Alan Kaplinsky (founder, former leader for 25 years, and now Senior Counsel of our Consumer Financial Services Group) spoke with Professor Mohsen Manesh of the University of Oregon School of Law about the Regime and the significant legal questions it raised. Manesh is an authority on corporate, contract, and LLC law and has written extensively about arbitration provisions in corporate charters and bylaws. This was his second appearance on our podcast to discuss shareholder arbitration and the SEC’s changing position on the subject.

Key Topics Discussed:

  • Why the SpaceX provisions are notable
  • How the SpaceX dispute-resolution regime works
  • The distinction under the federal securities laws
  • The importance of the class action waiver
  • The distinction between the two waivers
  • Shareholder consent
  • Broader competition between Delaware and Texas for corporate charters
  • Professor Manesh’s theory for why the FAA may not preempt Delaware’s restrictions

As Professor Manesh and I discussed, SpaceX’s Regime is about much more than arbitration. It presents a novel test of the intersection between corporate law, federal arbitration policy, federal securities law, forum selection, and class action practice. The litigation that eventually tests these provisions could shape the development of shareholder dispute resolution for years to come.

Consumer Finance Monitor is hosted by Alan Kaplinsky, Senior Counsel at Ballard Spahr, and the founder and former chair of the firm's Consumer Financial Services Group. We encourage listeners to subscribe to the podcast on their preferred platform for weekly insights into developments in the consumer finance industry.

A transcript of the recording will be available soon.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More