ARTICLE
29 May 2023

DOJ: No-Poach Dismissal Was Wrong On The Law

MF
Morrison & Foerster LLP

Contributor

Known for providing cutting-edge legal advice on matters that are redefining industries, Morrison & Foerster has 17 offices located in the United States, Asia, and Europe. Our clients include Fortune 100 companies, leading tech and life sciences companies, and some of the largest financial institutions. We also represent investment funds and startups.
Lisa Phelan spoke with Global Competition Review about United States v. Patel and what it means for other no-poach prosecutions and per se offenses.
United States Antitrust/Competition Law

Lisa Phelan spoke with Global Competition Review about United States v. Patel and what it means for other no-poach prosecutions and per se offenses.

"The DOJ may want to re-focus its resources on some more classic cartel conduct, that may lead to court opinions that re-establish some of these per se principles that DOJ historically relied on to build winning cases," Lisa said.

Read the full article (subscription required).

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More