ARTICLE
2 September 2018

Michigan Department Of Treasury Levels The Playing Field Regarding Sales Taxes From Online Retailers Beginning Oct. 1

DW
Dickinson Wright PLLC
Contributor
Dickinson Wright is a general practice business law firm with more than 475 attorneys among more than 40 practice areas and 16 industry groups. With 19 offices across the U.S. and in Toronto, we offer clients exceptional quality and client service, value for fees, industry expertise and business acumen.
In the wake of the United States Supreme Court overturning Quill v. North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298 (1992), by its ruling in South Dakota v. Wayfair, 138 S. Ct. 2080 (2018)...
United States Tax
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In the wake of the United States Supreme Court overturning Quill v. North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298 (1992), by its ruling in South Dakota v. Wayfair, 138 S. Ct. 2080 (2018), Michigan Department of Treasury issued a lot of guidelines, and changed its position on the sales and use tax nexus standard for online sellers. See Revenue Administrative Bulletin 2018-16. Previously, under Quill, in order for a state to impose sales or use tax on an out-of-state remote seller, the seller must have a "physical presence" in the state (in satisfaction of the "substantial nexus" element). However, the Supreme Court upheld a South Dakota law requiring remote sellers to remit sales tax if the seller's sales exceeded $100,000 or the seller has 200 or more separate transactions with consumers in the state. Thus, the "substantial nexus" requirement is met if the seller "avails itself of the substantial privilege of carrying on business in that jurisdiction," i.e. there's an economic presence. South Dakota v. Wayfair, 138 S. Ct. 2080, 2099 (2018). In following suit, Michigan Department of Treasury, beginning October 1, requires all remote sellers with sales exceeding $100,000 or having 200 or more separate transactions with consumers in Michigan in the previous calendar year to remit sales or use tax on all sales in Michigan and file all required returns.

This means remote sellers must review their 2017 calendar sales to determine if they have an economic presence beginning October 1 (although remote sellers meeting the thresholds are not liable for tax, penalties, or interest for sales prior to October 1).

Remote sellers not meeting the threshold may still remit sales and use tax.

This change allows Michigan business to compete on a level playing field with online retailers (without a Michigan brick-and-mortar). While Michigan businesses are not ultimately impacted in Michigan by the change—Michigan businesses remotely selling in other states should become aware of the potential for other states to change their laws as well. This will effect Michigan businesses out-of-state reporting obligations dramatically.

The Michigan Department of Treasury estimates that tax revenue will increase by more than $200 million.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

ARTICLE
2 September 2018

Michigan Department Of Treasury Levels The Playing Field Regarding Sales Taxes From Online Retailers Beginning Oct. 1

United States Tax
Contributor
Dickinson Wright is a general practice business law firm with more than 475 attorneys among more than 40 practice areas and 16 industry groups. With 19 offices across the U.S. and in Toronto, we offer clients exceptional quality and client service, value for fees, industry expertise and business acumen.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More